![]() Let’s take an example of how this can work. 1 Answer Sorted by: 0 I was able to find this article that looks to show an option in Lightning to remove Grand Totals and Subtotals. The SUMX function passed over this table to aggregate the original measure. Referencing a table (real or virtual) that holds the categorical columns in the Matrix or Table visual where the total row is being evaluated.Ģ. Such a measure will require just two elements:-ġ. All you need to do is create a measure that will aggregate your original measure correctly. ![]() The fact that people don’t understand the context of evaluations in total rows is not the fault of DAX.Ī very simple solution is knowing how to ensure that measures show correct totals. Instead, what is required here is a firm grasp of filter context and to understand that measures are always calculated within a specific filter context that shouldn’t change just because the measure is being calculated in a different place in a matrix or table. Personally, I won’t be voting for this option because I believe if measures always summed the rows above, it would lead to ambiguity and therefore confusion as to what exactly the measures were calculating. PLEASE give us the option to toggle totals to be a simple aggregate of the rows above also.” Currently, the total on a measure consists of the measure function itself, instead of the sum of the rows above. “It would be great if Grand Totals on a Matrix or Table would add up correctly to the sum of the rows when you include MEASURES in the visual. What is this request you ask? Here it is:. On the Microsoft Power BI Ideas Forum ( ), there is a long-running request (since July 2018) that has amassed a modest 341 votes to date.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |